提取方法对广佛手精油化学成分及抗氧化活性的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

广州新华学院药学院,广东 广州 510520

作者简介:

通讯作者:

欧晓华(1995—),女,广州新华学院助教,硕士。E-mail:1340250453@qq.com

中图分类号:

基金项目:

广东省本科高校教学质量与教学改革工程建设项目(编号:2022J029);广东省大学生创新创业训练计划项目(编号:S202513902033);广州新华学院教职工科研启动基金项目(编号:2024KYQNZK06)


Effects of different extraction methods on the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of Guangfoshou essential oil
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Xinhua University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510520, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 对比评价水蒸气蒸馏法(SD)、酶辅助水蒸气蒸馏法(EHSD)及超声辅助水蒸气蒸馏法(UASD)3种提取方法对广佛手精油的提取效率、化学成分及生物活性的影响。方法 分别采用SD法、EHSD法和UASD法提取广佛手精油,气相色谱—质谱联用(GC-MS)技术检测精油成分,聚类热图分析对比不同提取方法下获得的精油成分的差异,以总抗氧化活性、清除DPPH自由基能力及清除羟自由基能力为指标,对比3种提取方法获得的广佛手精油的抗氧化活性。结果 3种提取方法下的广佛手精油得率由高到低依次为UASD法(1.750%)>EHSD法(1.252%)>SD法(1.250%)。GC-MS成分分析共检测出38个成分,以烯烃类为主,其中3种提取方法获得的共有成分18个,共有成分中D-柠檬烯(45%~47%)和γ-松油烯(28%~30%)的相对含量较高;差异成分包括β-蒎烯、α-蒎烯、D-柠檬烯、环戊烷过氧羧酸叔丁酯和香叶基丙酮以及(Z)-柠檬醛等6种。差异成分的京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)通路富集分析结果显示,P值排名前20的通路多与氧化应激密切相关。抗氧化试验结果表明:试验浓度范围内,3种提取方法获得的精油的总抗氧化能力由强到弱依次为UASD法>SD法>EHSD法,DPPH自由基清除能力由强到弱为UASD法(IC50=31.15 mg/mL)>EHSD法(IC50=32.82 mg/mL)>SD法(IC50=34.74 mg/mL),羟自由基清除能力由强到弱为UASD法(IC50=3.82 mg/mL)>SD法(IC50=9.14 mg/mL)>EHSD法(IC50=9.43 mg/mL)。结论 UASD可作为广佛手精油提取的最优方法。

    Abstract:

    Objective To comparatively evaluate the effects of three extraction methods, i.e., steam distillation (SD), enzyme-assisted steam distillation (EHSD), and ultrasound-assisted steam distillation (UASD), on the extraction efficiency, chemical composition, and bioactivity of Citrus medica L. var. sarcodactylis (Guangfoshou) essential oil.Methods Guangfoshou essential oil was extracted using SD, EHSD, and UASD. The chemical constituents of the essential oils were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Cluster heatmap analysis was employed to compare differences in essential oil composition obtained by the three extraction methods. Antioxidant activity was assessed based on total antioxidant capacity, DPPH radical scavenging activity, and hydroxyl radical scavenging activity.Results The yields of Guangfoshou essential oil obtained by the three methods, in descending order, were UASD (1.750%)>EHSD (1.252%)>SD (1.250%). A total of 38 components were identified by GC-MS, mainly olefinic compounds, among which 18 were common to all three methods. Among the common components, D-limonene (45%~47%) and γ-terpinene (28%~30%) exhibited the highest relative contents. The differential components included six compounds: β-pinene, α-pinene, D-limonene, tert-butyl peroxycyclopentanecarboxylate, geranylacetone, and (Z)-citral. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of these differential components showed that the top 20 pathways ranked by P-value were mostly closely related to oxidative stress. Antioxidant results indicated that, within the tested concentration range, the total antioxidant capacity of essential oils obtained by the three methods decreased in the order UASD>SD>EHSD. The DPPH radical scavenging activity followed the order UASD (IC50=31.15 mg/mL)>EHSD (IC50=32.82 mg/mL)>SD (IC50=34.74 mg/mL), while hydroxyl radical scavenging activity followed the order UASD (IC50=3.82 mg/mL)>SD (IC50=9.14 mg/mL)>EHSD (IC50=9.43 mg/mL).Conclusion UASD can be considered the optimal method for the extraction of Guangfoshou essential oil.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王有娣,陈文涛,严斌,等.提取方法对广佛手精油化学成分及抗氧化活性的影响[J].食品与机械,2026,42(8):189-197.
Wang Youdi, Chen Wentao, Yan Bin, et al. Effects of different extraction methods on the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of Guangfoshou essential oil[J]. Food & Machinery,2026,42(8):189-197.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-18
  • 最后修改日期:2026-03-06
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-09-22
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
×
《食品与机械》
友情提示
友情提示 一、 近日有不少作者反应我刊官网无法打开,是因为我刊网站正在升级,旧网站仍在百度搜索排名前列。请认准《食品与机械》唯一官方网址:http://www.ifoodmm.com/spyjx/home 唯一官方邮箱:foodmm@ifoodmm.com; 联系电话:0731-85258200,希望广大读者和作者仔细甄别。