基于多模型软投票融合的青提失水率预测模型
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1陕西理工大学机械工程学院,陕西 汉中 723000;2陕西省工业自动化重点实验室,陕西 汉中 723000

作者简介:

通讯作者:

景敏(1978—),女,陕西理工大学教授,博士。E-mail:jingmin@snut.edu.cn

中图分类号:

基金项目:

陕西省重大产业创新链项目(编号:2021ZDLSF06-07);陕西省自然科学基础研究项目(编号:2022JM-383);陕西理工大学人才启动项目(编号:SLGRCQD2103)


Prediction model of green grape water loss rate based on multi-model soft voting fusion
Author:
Affiliation:

1School of Mechanical Engineering, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, Shaanxi 723000, China;2Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Industrial Automation, Hanzhong, Shaanxi 723000, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 依托LED诱导荧光光谱系统,提出一种利用采集光谱数据结合多模型软投票融合预测青提失水率的方法,实现青提失水率快速无损检测,控制损耗、保障品质。方法 采集100个青提样本光谱数据,利用多元散射校正(MSC)、标准正态变量变换(SNV)、归一化处理及萨维茨基—戈雷滤波(SG)进行预处理,采用连续投影算法进行特征波长筛选,构建青提失水率随机森林(RF)、偏最小二乘(PLS)、最小二乘支持向量机(LSSVM)单模型和多模型软投票融合预测模型,并进行对比分析。结果 单模型中LSSVM的综合性能最优,但存在明显过拟合风险;基于测试集Rp2与平均绝对误差(MAE)指标分配权重构建多模型软投票融合模型,测试集Rp2较LSSVM单模型提升25.3%,MAE降低27.6%,过拟合现象得到显著改善,同时在拟合精度与泛化能力上均实现优化。结论 多模型软投票融合策略的预测精度优于单模型,其具有更强稳定性、泛化能力与抗过拟合性能。

    Abstract:

    Objective This study aims to achieve rapid and non-destructive detection of water loss rate in green grapes, control losses, and ensure quality. Based on an LED-induced fluorescence spectroscopy system, a prediction method combining collected spectral data with a multi-model soft voting fusion approach was proposed for green grape water loss rate estimation.Methods Spectral data from 100 green grape samples were collected. Preprocessing was performed using multivariate scatter correction (MSC), standard normal variate transformation (SNV), normalization, and Savitzky-Golay (SG) filtering. Feature wavelength selection was carried out using the successive projections algorithm. Based on this, prediction models for green grape water loss rate were constructed using Random Forest (RF), Partial Least Squares (PLS), and Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LSSVM), as well as a single-model and a multi-model soft voting fusion model, followed by comparative analysis.Results Among the single models, LSSVM showed the best overall performance but exhibited a clear risk of overfitting. A multi-model soft voting fusion model was constructed by assigning weights based on the test set Rp2 and mean absolute error (MAE) index. Compared with the LSSVM single model, the test set Rp2 performance improved by 25.3%, and MAE decreased by 27.6%, with overfitting significantly alleviated. Meanwhile, improvements were achieved in both fitting accuracy and generalization ability.Conclusion The multi-model soft voting fusion strategy exhibits higher prediction accuracy than single models, with stronger stability, generalization ability, and anti-overfitting performance.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

樊改,景敏,计丰,等.基于多模型软投票融合的青提失水率预测模型[J].食品与机械,2026,42(6):12-20.
FAN Gai, JING Min, JI Feng, et al. Prediction model of green grape water loss rate based on multi-model soft voting fusion[J]. Food & Machinery,2026,42(6):12-20.

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-10
  • 最后修改日期:2026-04-10
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-13
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
×
《食品与机械》
友情提示
友情提示 一、 近日有不少作者反应我刊官网无法打开,是因为我刊网站正在升级,旧网站仍在百度搜索排名前列。请认准《食品与机械》唯一官方网址:http://www.ifoodmm.com/spyjx/home 唯一官方邮箱:foodmm@ifoodmm.com; 联系电话:0731-85258200,希望广大读者和作者仔细甄别。