基于主成分分析的21种粳性黄米品质评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

赵宁,女,西北农林科技大学在读硕士研究生

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

陕西省重点研发计划项目(编号:2021NY-155);榆林市科技计划项目(编号:2018-20)


Quality evaluation of 21 kinds of non-waxy proso millet based on principal component analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:对不同粳性黄米品种的品质进行评价。方法:以21个粳性黄米品种为试验材料,测定其营养成分、糊化特性、蒸煮特性及质构特性,分析品质差异及指标相关性,运用主成分分析进行综合评价。结果:质构特性、粗脂肪含量、回生值、破损值、最终黏度在品种间差异较大,起糊温度和淀粉含量的变异系数较小,是较为稳定的指标。主成分分析结果显示前3个主成分反映了原变量72.04%的信息,筛选出最终黏度、回生值、硬度和黏附性为关键指标,根据综合得分评价出粳性黄米品种的综合品质优劣。结论:陇糜10号、内糜9号、陇糜8号、榆糜3号、宁糜13号的综合品质最优,最终黏度、回生值、硬度和黏附性可作为粳性黄米品质的代表性指标,用于指导黄米品种筛选。

    Abstract:

    Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the quality of different non-waxy proso millet varieties. Methods: 21 non-waxy proso millet varieties were selected as experimental materials, and their nutritional composition, pasting characteristics, cooking characteristics and texture characteristics were measured. The quality difference and index correlations between different non-waxy proso millet varieties were analyzed and compared. Principal component analysis was used to evaluate their quality. Results: The texture characteristics, crude fat content, setback, breakdown and final viscosity had great differences among the tested varieties, and the variation coefficient of pasting temperature and starch content was small, which were relatively stable indexes. The results of principal component analysis showed that the first three principal components reflected 72.04% of the information of the original variable. The final viscosity, setback, hardness and gumminess were selected as the key indexes. The comprehensive quality of non-waxy proso millet varieties was evaluated according to the comprehensive score. Conclusion: Longmi 10, Neimi 9, Longmi 8, Yumi 3 and Ningmi 13 had the best comprehensive quality. The final viscosity, setback, hardness and gumminess could be used as representative indexes of quality of non-waxy proso millet to guide the selection of proso millet varieties.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵宁,解菲,梁鸡保,等.基于主成分分析的21种粳性黄米品质评价[J].食品与机械,2022,(8):22-27,33.
ZHAO Ning, XIE Fei, LIANG Ji-bao, et al. Quality evaluation of 21 kinds of non-waxy proso millet based on principal component analysis[J]. Food & Machinery,2022,(8):22-27,33.

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-10-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
×
《食品与机械》
友情提示
友情提示 一、 近日有不少作者反应我刊官网无法打开,是因为我刊网站正在升级,旧网站仍在百度搜索排名前列。请认准《食品与机械》唯一官方网址:http://www.ifoodmm.com/spyjx/home 唯一官方邮箱:foodmm@ifoodmm.com; 联系电话:0731-85258200,希望广大读者和作者仔细甄别。