面包吸附等温线的测定及测定方法比较
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(湖北工业大学生物工程与食品学院菲利普斯亲水胶体研究中心,湖北 武汉 430068)

作者简介:

董磊,男,湖北工业大学在读硕士研究生。

通讯作者:

姜发堂(1964—),男,湖北工业大学教授,博士。E-mail:jiangft@mail.hbut.edu.cn

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:31671827)


Determination of bread adsorption isotherm and comparison of determination methods
Author:
Affiliation:

(Glyn O Philips Hydrocolloid Research Centre at HUT, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:研究不同方法对测定面包吸附等温线的影响及在25 ℃下面包含水率与水分活度的关系。方法:采用饱和盐溶液法(SSS)、动态水分转移规律分析仪法(DWT)和动态蒸汽吸附法(DVS)测定面包在25 ℃下和0.100~0.902水分活度范围内的水分吸附等温线,采用7种吸附模型拟合结果。结果:面包的吸附等温线属于Ⅱ型曲线。采用SSS法和DWT法测定整个面包吸附等温线的最佳拟合模型分别为Halsey模型和Peleg模型;采用DVS法测定面包瓤和面包皮吸附等温线的最佳拟合模型分别是Halsey模型和Oswin模型。同时,SSS法不限制面包体积和质量,但试验用时较长且高湿度下难以提供稳定湿度环境;DWT法不限制面包体积和质量且能提供稳定的湿度条件;相对于SSS法和DWT法,DVS法尽管可快速得到面包水分吸附等温线的结果,但该方法限制了面包的质量和体积且无法同时进行平行试验。结论:DWT法更适合面包吸附等温线的测定。

    Abstract:

    Objective: This study focuses on investigating the effects of different methods on the determination of adsorption isotherm of bread and the relationship between moisture content and water activity of bread at 25 ℃. Methods: The water adsorption isotherms of bread at 25 ℃ and in the range of 0.100~0.902 water activity (AW) were measured by saturated salt solution method (SSS), dynamic water transfer analyzer (DWT) and dynamic vapor adsorption method (DVS), and then seven different kinds of adsorption models were used to fit the results. Results: The adsorption isotherm of the bread belongs to the II curve. Halsey model and Peleg model are the best fitting models for measuring the whole bread adsorption isotherm by SSS method and DWT method respectively. Halsey model and Oswin model were the best fitting models for determining the adsorption isotherms of bread crumb and crust by DVS method. Though the SSS method could not limit the volume and quality of the bread, it is time-consuming and unstable in high-humidity condition. However, the DWT method could provide stable humidity conditions without limiting the volume or the quality of the bread. Compared with the SSS method and the DWT method, the DVS method could obtain the result quickly, but the quality and volume of the bread were limited. The results provide a theoretical basis for the choice of the adsorption isotherm measurement method and the quality control and storage stability of bread. Conclusion: DWT method is more suitable for the determination of bread adsorption isotherm.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

董磊,肖满,姜发堂.面包吸附等温线的测定及测定方法比较[J].食品与机械,2021,37(10):38-43.
DONGLei, XIAOMan, JIANGFatang. Determination of bread adsorption isotherm and comparison of determination methods[J]. Food & Machinery,2021,37(10):38-43.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-23
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-15
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
×
《食品与机械》
友情提示
友情提示 一、 近日有不少作者反应我刊官网无法打开,是因为我刊网站正在升级,旧网站仍在百度搜索排名前列。请认准《食品与机械》唯一官方网址:http://www.ifoodmm.com/spyjx/home 唯一官方邮箱:foodmm@ifoodmm.com; 联系电话:0731-85258200,希望广大读者和作者仔细甄别。