转基因食品安全:基于研究事实与逻辑分析的评述
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(长沙理工大学化学与食品工程学院,湖南 长沙 410114)

作者简介:

成映波(1963—),男,长沙理工大学副教授,硕士。E-mail:1972859120@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


The safety of genetically modified food: a flat statement based on the facts of experimental study and logic
Author:
Affiliation:

(School of Chemistry and Food Engineering, Changsha University of Science &Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410114, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    文章通过对历年转基因实践和现行认知状态的研判,表述了一种对基因和转基因概念的普适性认知,提出了“偏基因”和“转基因偏好”概念。对转基因食品安全争论双方的观点和依据做了全面的梳理。基于中国知网和“Web of Science”,就转基因食品安全方向的相关论文进行了检索,揭示了实验性研究论文极少,不足以支撑“转基因食品安全与否”的争论。提出了一些当前的紧迫问题并作了逻辑分析和讨论,指出人类只能在边做边吃、边改边禁的100~200年中取得大数据或“安全印象”。

    Abstract:

    A universality recognition to gene and gene modification was mentioned and a concept of “partial gene” etc was proposed according to the practice of gene operations in these years. The opinions and their bases at the two sides of GMF safety argument was screened and teased out entirely. Based on the datum in CNKI and Web of Science, It was discovered that the experimental theses were very few, which can not support this argument at all. Some urgent problems were discussed logically and it has been pointed out that mankind would eat GMF inescapablely while improving and restricting in the future 100-200 years as the big data or a safety impression would being obtained.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

成映波.转基因食品安全:基于研究事实与逻辑分析的评述[J].食品与机械,2019,(1):97-104.
CHENGYingbo. The safety of genetically modified food: a flat statement based on the facts of experimental study and logic[J]. Food & Machinery,2019,(1):97-104.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-02
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-11-26
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
×
《食品与机械》
友情提示
友情提示 一、 近日有不少作者反应我刊官网无法打开,是因为我刊网站正在升级,旧网站仍在百度搜索排名前列。请认准《食品与机械》唯一官方网址:http://www.ifoodmm.com/spyjx/home 唯一官方邮箱:foodmm@ifoodmm.com; 联系电话:0731-85258200,希望广大读者和作者仔细甄别。