基于主成分分析的不同种鲜食葡萄品质评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 中南林业科技大学食品科学与工程学院,湖南 长沙 410004;2. 粮油深加工与品质控制湖南省协同创新中心,湖南 长沙 410004;3. 特医食品加工湖南省重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410004)

作者简介:

潘照,女,中南林业科技大学在读硕士研究生。

通讯作者:

周文化(1969—),男,中南林业科技大学教授,博士。E-mail: 1479674265@qq.com

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家林业局948项目(编号:2015-4-26);特医食品加工湖南省重点实验室建设项目(编号:2017TP1021);长沙市科技计划项目(编号:kc1704007)


Quality evaluation of different table grape based on principal component analysis
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Food Science and Engineering, Central South Forestry University of Science and Technology University, Changsha, Hunan 410004, China; 2. Grain and Oil Processing and Quality Control of Collaborative Innovation Center in Hunan Province, Changsha, Hunan 410004, China; 3. Hunan Key Laboratory of Processed Food for Special Medical Purpose, Changsha, Hunan 410004, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为更加准确地评价鲜食型葡萄的品质,选择了南方种植与售卖的18种鲜食葡萄,对其果实的14个基本品质指标进行检测,并进行感官评分和相关性分析,采用主成分分析法建立了综合得分数学模型。结果表明,不同品种鲜食葡萄各品质指标间含量差异明显,其中硬度差异最大(变异系数为51.18%);相关性分析显示各指标间存在独立性和一定程度的相关性;主成分分析提取了4个主成分因子,累积贡献率达到了88.63%;综合得分显示葡萄品质最好的为黑提、阳光玫瑰、魏可、红地球和巨玫瑰,巨峰、红宝石和金手指品质相对较差。

    Abstract:

    The study was to accurately evaluate the quality of table grape,18 different varieties of table grapes were selected. 14 basic quality indicators were measured and analyzed by sensory scores and correlation analysis. Principal component analysis was employed to build a composite score mathematical model. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the quality indexes among different grape varieties, among them, hardness difference was largest (coefficient of variation is 51.18%). Correlation analysis showed that there was an independence and a certain degree of correlation between indicators. Principal component analysis was extracted from 4 principal component factors, and cumulative contribution rate reached 88.63%. The comprehensive score comfirmed that the best grape was Black Grape, Shine-Musca, Wink and Jumeigui; The quality of Kyoho Grape, Ruby Seedless and Gold finger were relatively poor.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

潘照,周文化,肖玥惠子.基于主成分分析的不同种鲜食葡萄品质评价[J].食品与机械,2018,34(9):139-146.
PANZhao, ZHOUWenhua, XIAOYuehuizi. Quality evaluation of different table grape based on principal component analysis[J]. Food & Machinery,2018,34(9):139-146.

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-06
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
×
《食品与机械》
友情提示
友情提示 一、 近日有不少作者反应我刊官网无法打开,是因为我刊网站正在升级,旧网站仍在百度搜索排名前列。请认准《食品与机械》唯一官方网址:http://www.ifoodmm.com/spyjx/home 唯一官方邮箱:foodmm@ifoodmm.com; 联系电话:0731-85258200,希望广大读者和作者仔细甄别。