包装方式对宰后牛肉成熟过程中食用品质的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 南京晓庄学院食品科学学院,江苏 南京 211171;2. 南京农业大学食品科技学院,江苏 南京 210095;3. 南京农业大学肉品加工与质量控制教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210095;4. 南京农业大学食品安全与营养协同创新中心,江苏 南京 210095)

作者简介:

扶庆权(1975—),男,南京晓庄学院高级实验师,博士。E-mail:fuqingquan@126.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

江苏省科技厅自然科学青年基金项目(编号:BK20170146);江苏省高校自然科学研究面上项目(编号:17KJB550006);南京晓庄学院高层次培育项目(编号:2016NXY14)


Effects of different packaging methods on beef quality during the postmortem aging
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. School of Food Science, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211171, China; 2. College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Meat Processingand Food Control, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China; 4. SynergeticInnovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210095, China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以真空包装作为对照,研究托盘包装和气调包装对牛肉宰后成熟过程中食用品质的影响。取6头宰后24 h的黄牛左侧背最长肌,切割成大小基本相同的肉块并随机分组进行托盘包装、真空包装和气调包装(2.54 cm厚),在4 ℃下冷藏成熟0,4,7,10 d,分别测定颜色、嫩度、贮藏损失、离心损失、蒸煮损失和水分分布状态,评价包装方式对宰后成熟过程中牛肉食用品质的影响。结果表明:与真空包装相比,托盘包装和气调包装牛肉样品的蒸煮损失在宰后成熟过程中无显著性差异(P>0.05),而贮藏损失差异显著(P<0.05);托盘包装和气调包装牛肉样品的a*值和自由水含量较高(P<0.05),而托盘包装和气调包装牛肉样品的嫩度显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。说明气调包装和托盘包装有助于改善牛肉的颜色,而对牛肉嫩度和水分分布状态却不具有改善作用。

    Abstract:

    Effects of air packaging and modified atmosphere packaging on the quality of fresh beef during postmortem aging was studied using vacuum packaging as control treatment. Six left side of longissimus dorsi muscles of yellow cattle were precooled at 4 ℃ for 24 h. After 24 h postmortem, beef samples (2.54 cm thick) were trimmed and mixed, and randomly divided into three groups. The beef samples were stored for 4 d, 7 d and 10 d in dark refrigeration house at 4 ℃ to mimic commercial storage conditions. At the end of each point, the meat color, tenderness, purge loss, centrifuge loss, cooking loss and the state of moisture distribution were determined immediately to evaluate the effect of different packaging methods on beef quality during postmortem aging. The results showed that the cooking loss of samples from air packaging and modified atmosphere packaging was not different significantly compared to vacuum packaging (P>0.05), while the purge loss of samples from air packaging and modified atmosphere packaging was significantly different (P<0.05). Air packaging and modified atmosphere packaging presented better improvement on CIE a* values and higher population of free water and lower tenderness compared to vacuum packaging (P<0.05). In conclusion, air packaging and modified atmosphere packaging could improve the color of beef samples compared to vacuum packaging. However, air packaging and modified atmosphere packaging could not improve the tenderness and the state of moisture distribution.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

扶庆权,张万刚,王海鸥,等.包装方式对宰后牛肉成熟过程中食用品质的影响[J].食品与机械,2018,34(6):127-132.
FUQingquan, ZHANGWangang, WANGHaiou, et al. Effects of different packaging methods on beef quality during the postmortem aging[J]. Food & Machinery,2018,34(6):127-132.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-09
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-03-17
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
×
《食品与机械》
友情提示
友情提示 一、 近日有不少作者反应我刊官网无法打开,是因为我刊网站正在升级,旧网站仍在百度搜索排名前列。请认准《食品与机械》唯一官方网址:http://www.ifoodmm.com/spyjx/home 唯一官方邮箱:foodmm@ifoodmm.com; 联系电话:0731-85258200,希望广大读者和作者仔细甄别。